Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] perf: Sample additional clock value
From: John Stultz <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-05 19:17:42
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:51:58PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:quoted
Currently three clocks are implemented: CLOCK_REALITME = 0, CLOCK_MONOTONIC = 1 and CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW = 2. The clock field is 5 bits wide to allow for future extension to custom, non-POSIX clock sources(MAX_CLOCK for those is 16, see include/uapi/linux/time.h) like ARM CoreSight (hardware trace) timestamp generator.quoted
@@ -304,7 +305,16 @@ struct perf_event_attr { mmap2 : 1, /* include mmap with inode data */ comm_exec : 1, /* flag comm events that are due to an exec */ uevents : 1, /* allow uevents into the buffer */ - __reserved_1 : 38; + + /* + * clock: one of the POSIX clock IDs: + * + * 0 - CLOCK_REALTIME + * 1 - CLOCK_MONOTONIC + * 4 - CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW + */ + clock : 5, /* clock type */ + __reserved_1 : 33; union { __u32 wakeup_events; /* wakeup every n events */This would put a constraint on actually changing MAX_CLOCKS, are the time people OK with that? Thomas, John?
Yea, I'd not want to enshrine MAX_CLOCKS if we can avoid it. We're getting a bit close to it these days. thanks -john