Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-12-15

Re: [CFT] Can I get some Tested-By's on this series?

From: Serge Hallyn <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-15 19:38:48
Also in: linux-man, lkml, stable

Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):
Stéphane Graber [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:38:18PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted
Serge Hallyn [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org):
quoted
Will people please test these patches with their container project?

These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if
I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it.  I
really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks
userspace again.

The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for
/proc/<pid>/setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the
functionality of the patchset.

With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily
reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP.

Eric
Is there a git tree we can clone?
Have either of you been able to check to see if any of my changes
affects lxc?

I am trying to gauge how hard and how fast I should push to Linus.  lxc
being the largest adopter of unprivileged user namespaces for general
purpose containers.

I expect you just call newuidmap and newgidmap and don't actually care
about not being able to set gid_map without privilege.  But I really
want to avoid pushing a security fix and then being surprised that
things like lxc break.

Eric
Hi Eric,

I've unfortunately been pretty busy this week as I was (well, still am)
travelling to South Africa for a meeting. I don't have a full kernel
tree around here and a full git clone isn't really doable over the kind
of Internet I've got here :)

Hopefully Serge can give it a quick try, otherwise I should be able to
do some tests on Tuesday when I'm back home.
I thought Serge was going to but I haven't heard yet so I am prodding ;-)
Ok, thanks - yes, unprivileged lxc is working fine with your kernels.
Just to be sure I was testing the right thing I also tested using
my unprivileged nsexec testcases, and they failed on setgroup/setgid
as now expected, and succeeded there without your patches.

thanks,
-serge
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help