Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2014-12-08

Re: [CFT][PATCH 2/7] userns: Don't allow setgroups until a gid mapping has been setablished

From: Andy Lutomirski <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-08 22:26:02
Also in: linux-man, lkml, stable

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Richard Weinberger [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 23:07 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
quoted
setgroups is unique in not needing a valid mapping before it can be called,
in the case of setgroups(0, NULL) which drops all supplemental groups.

The design of the user namespace assumes that CAP_SETGID can not actually
be used until a gid mapping is established.  Therefore add a helper function
to see if the user namespace gid mapping has been established and call
that function in the setgroups permission check.

This is part of the fix for CVE-2014-8989, being able to drop groups
without privilege using user namespaces.

Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
 include/linux/user_namespace.h | 9 +++++++++
 kernel/groups.c                | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
index e95372654f09..41cc26e5a350 100644
--- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ struct user_namespace {

 extern struct user_namespace init_user_ns;

+static inline bool userns_gid_mappings_established(const struct user_namespace *ns)
+{
+     bool established;
+     smp_mb__before_atomic();
+     established = ACCESS_ONCE(ns->gid_map.nr_extents) != 0;
+     smp_mb__after_atomic();
+     return established;
+}
+
Maybe this is a stupid question, but why do we need all this magic
around established =  ... ?
The purpose of this code is to check whether ns->gid_map.nr_extents != 0
in a lock-free manner?
See my other comment -- the ordering will matter at the end of the series.

It might be nicer to do this differently: in may_setgroups, do:

if (!userns_gid_mappings_established)
  return false;

/* User code can start with setgroups allowed, disallow it, and then
add a mapping.  We need to prevent a race that could cause this
function to return true. */
smp_rmb();

if (!userns_setgroups_allowed)
  return false;

--Andy
Thanks,
//richard


-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help