Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio_balloon: convert to virtio 1.0 endian-ness
From: Cornelia Huck <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-02 18:39:42
Also in:
lkml
From: Cornelia Huck <hidden>
Date: 2014-12-02 18:39:42
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:44:06 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" [off-list ref] wrote:
balloon device is not part of virtio 1.0 spec. Still, it's easy enough to make it handle endian-ness exactly as other virtio 1.0 devices: what we gain from this, is that there's no need to special-case it in virtio core.
Well, the balloon is weird in a number of ways, including its always little-endian config space. But I'm not quite sure the spec covers this?
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <redacted> --- include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 5 +++-- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
struct virtio_balloon_stat {
- __u16 tag;
- __u64 val;
+ __virtio16 tag;
+ __virtio64 val;
} __attribute__((packed));
Would the respective fields in the spec need updating? While it is
actually talking about legacy requirements, the fields are not
specified as __virtio{16,64}.
Also, is changing the stat fields enough? I've not looked into balloon
operation, but does the payload need some endianess conversion as well?