Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] vfs: Non-blockling buffered fs read (page cache only)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2014-11-11 21:42:40
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2014-11-11 21:42:40
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:03:14PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Milosz Tanski [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
Can you write a test (or set of) for fstests that exercises this new functionality? I'm not worried about performance, just correctness....Sure thing. Can you point me at the fstests repo? A quick google search reveals lots of projects named fstests, most of them abandoned.I think he's referring to xfstests. Still, I think that's the wrong place for functional testing. ltp would be better, imo.
I don't follow. Can you explain why is xfstests be the wrong place to exercise this functionality and what makes ltp a better choice? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux AIO, see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>