Thread (16 messages) read the whole thread 16 messages, 2 authors, 2014-11-25

Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] crypto: AF_ALG: add AEAD support

From: Stephan Mueller <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-24 14:58:42
Also in: linux-crypto, lkml

Am Montag, 24. November 2014, 22:29:46 schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
quoted
This patch adds the AEAD support for AF_ALG.

The AEAD implementation uses the entire memory handling and
infrastructure of the existing skcipher implementation.

To use AEAD, the user space consumer has to use the salg_type named
"aead". The AEAD extension only uses the bind callback as the key
differentiator. The previously added functions that select whether to
use AEAD or ablkcipher crypto API functions depend on the TFM type
allocated during the bind() call.

The addition of AEAD brings a bit of overhead to calculate the size
of
the ciphertext, because the AEAD implementation of the kernel crypto
API makes implied assumption on the location of the authentication
tag. When performing an encryption, the tag will be added to the
created ciphertext (note, the tag is placed adjacent to the
ciphertext). For decryption, the caller must hand in the ciphertext
with the tag appended to the ciphertext. Therefore, the selection of
the used memory needs to add/subtract the tag size from the
source/destination buffers depending on the encryption type. The
code is provided with comments explainint when and how that
operation is performed.

Note: The AF_ALG interface does not support zero length input data.
Such zero length input data may be used if one wants to access the
hash implementation of an AEAD directly (e.g. the GHASH of GCM or
CMAC for CCM). However, this is a use case that is not of interest.
GHASH or CMAC is directly available via the hash AF_ALG interface
and we therefore do not need to take precautions for this use case.

A fully working example using all aspects of AEAD is provided at
http://www.chronox.de/libkcapi.html

Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <redacted>
I appreciate the effort to share code, but shoe-horning AEAD into
algif_skcipher is just too ugly.
Ok. But in the code you see that skcipher is a 100% subset of AEAD. For 
AEAD, all we need to do in addition to normal symmetric ciphers is to 
select the AEAD kernel crypto API calls, to locate and use the AD and to 
ensure we have the right memory size to process the tag.

How about the following:

Use algif_skcipher.c as the common code which requires:

- function pointers for the kernel crypto API backends

- function pointers for the AEAD specific handling which are invoked at 
the right places -- they are NULL in case of skcipher
How about let's just start with a separate algif_aead and then
add helpers to merge common code as applicable?
When we have a separate algif_aead, then I guess we want to allow 
skcipher and aead to be configured and compiled independently.

That raises the question where the common code should go? I would not 
suggest to put it into a header file. However, when adding it to a C 
file, how do you propose it should be considered in the Makefile. That C 
file needs to be compile once with either skcipher or aead.
Thanks,

Ciao
Stephan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help