On 11/06/2014 05:07 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:57:36PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
[..]
quoted
You see that doing
if (panic_on_warn) {
panic_on_warn = 0;
panic(...);
}
is racy, I hope. If two threads WARN() at the same time, then there's
nothing preventing a double panic() because WARN() itself is not
serialized against anything. So both the current comment and your
suggested revision comment are bogus.
panic() is serialized on panic_lock. So I guess it is fine to hit WARN()
on multiple cpus. Do you see an issue there?
Oops -- didn't see this until just now.
Once again, Vivek beat me to the punch :) and much more succinctly than I will
ever be able to do. :)
P.
Thanks
Vivek