On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Eric W. Biederman [off-list ref] wrote:
Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Why should MNT_LOCKED on submounts be enforced?
Is it because, if you retain a reference to the detached tree, then
you can see under the submounts?
Yes. MNT_DETACH is a recursive operation that detaches all of the mount
and all of it's submounts. Which means you can see under the submounts
if you have a reference to a detached mount.
quoted
If so, let's fix *that*. Because
otherwise the whole model of pivot_root + detach will break.
I am not certain what you are referring to. pivot_root doesn't
manipulate the mount tree so you can see under anything.
What I believe is the appropriate fix is to fail umount2(...,MNT_DETACH)
if there are any referenced mount points being detached that have a
locked submount.
Most of the container-using things do, roughly:
Unshare userns and mountns
Mount some new stuff
pivot_root to the new stuff
MNT_DETACH the old.
That last step will almost always fail if you make this change.
--Andy