[PATCHv8.2] fanotify: enable close-on-exec on events' fd when requested in fanotify_init()
From: Yann Droneaud <hidden>
Date: 2014-10-03 08:39:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml, stable
Subsystem:
fanotify, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), fsnotify: filesystem notification infrastructure, the rest · Maintainers:
Jan Kara, Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
According to commit 80af258867648 ('fanotify: groups can specify
their f_flags for new fd'), file descriptors created as part of
file access notification events inherit flags from the
event_f_flags argument passed to syscall fanotify_init(2)[1].
Unfortunately O_CLOEXEC is currently silently ignored.
Indeed, event_f_flags are only given to dentry_open(), which only
seems to care about O_ACCMODE and O_PATH in do_dentry_open(),
O_DIRECT in open_check_o_direct() and O_LARGEFILE in
generic_file_open().
It's a pity, since, according to some lookup on various search
engines and http://codesearch.debian.net/, there's already some
userspace code which use O_CLOEXEC:
- in systemd's readahead[2]:
fanotify_fd = fanotify_init(FAN_CLOEXEC|FAN_NONBLOCK, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC|O_NOATIME);
- in clsync[3]:
#define FANOTIFY_EVFLAGS (O_LARGEFILE|O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC)
int fanotify_d = fanotify_init(FANOTIFY_FLAGS, FANOTIFY_EVFLAGS);
- in examples [4] from "Filesystem monitoring in the Linux
kernel" article[5] by Aleksander Morgado:
if ((fanotify_fd = fanotify_init (FAN_CLOEXEC,
O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC | O_LARGEFILE)) < 0)
Additionally, since commit 48149e9d3a7e ('fanotify: check file
flags passed in fanotify_init'). having O_CLOEXEC as part of
fanotify_init() second argument is expressly allowed.
So it seems expected to set close-on-exec flag on the file
descriptors if userspace is allowed to request it with O_CLOEXEC.
But Andrew Morton raised[6] the concern that enabling now
close-on-exec might break existing applications which ask for
O_CLOEXEC but expect the file descriptor to be inherited
across exec().
In the other hand, as reported by Mihai Donțu[7], not setting
close-on-exec on the file descriptor returned as part of file
access notify can break applications due to deadlock.
So close-on-exec is needed for most applications.
More, applications asking for close-on-exec are likely expecting
it to be enabled, relying on O_CLOEXEC being effective. If not,
it might weaken their security, as noted by Jan Kara[8].
So this patch replaces call to macro get_unused_fd() by a call
to function get_unused_fd_flags() with event_f_flags value as
argument. This way O_CLOEXEC flag in the second argument of
fanotify_init(2) syscall is interpreted and close-on-exec
get enabled when requested.
[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fanotify_init.2.html
[2] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/readahead/readahead-collect.c?id=v208#n294
[3] https://github.com/xaionaro/clsync/blob/v0.2.1/sync.c#L1631
https://github.com/xaionaro/clsync/blob/v0.2.1/configuration.h#L38
[4] http://www.lanedo.com/~aleksander/fanotify/fanotify-example.c
[5] http://www.lanedo.com/2013/filesystem-monitoring-linux-kernel/
[6] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141001153621.65e9258e65a6167bf2e4cb50@linux-foundation.org
[7] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141002095046.3715eb69@mdontu-l
[8] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141002104410.GB19748-+0h/O2h83AeN3ZZ/Hiejyg@public.gmane.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1411562410.git.ydroneaud-RlY5vtjFyJ1hl2p70BpVqQ@public.gmane.orgm
Cc: Mihai Donțu <redacted>
Cc: Pádraig Brady <redacted>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <redacted>
Cc: Jan Kara <redacted>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <redacted>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk-manpages <redacted>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <redacted>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <redacted>
Cc: Eric Paris <redacted>
Cc: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <redacted>
Reviewed by: Heinrich Schuchardt [off-list ref]
Tested-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <redacted>
---
Hi Andrew,
Fair enough, it sounds like the risk is acceptable.
OK.
Can we get a new version sent out with all this new info appropriately changelogged?
Of course ! Please find an updated patch with revamped commit message. Changes from v8.1: - added more Cc: - added Reviewed-by: - rewrote commit message. fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index b13992a41bd9..c991616acca9 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int create_fd(struct fsnotify_group *group, pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event); - client_fd = get_unused_fd(); + client_fd = get_unused_fd_flags(group->fanotify_data.f_flags); if (client_fd < 0) return client_fd;
--
1.9.3