On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/03/2014 05:17 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
quoted
allow user space to generate eBPF programs
uapi/linux/bpf.h: eBPF instruction set definition
linux/filter.h: the rest
This patch only moves macro definitions, but practically it freezes
existing
eBPF instruction set, though new instructions can still be added in the
future.
These eBPF definitions cannot go into uapi/linux/filter.h, since the names
may conflict with existing applications.
Full eBPF ISA description is in Documentation/networking/filter.txt
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <redacted>
Ok, given you post the remaining two RFCs later on this window as
you indicate, I have no objections:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <redacted>
David,
I see that all 4 patches are marked as rfc, whereas I tagged
only 3 and 4 as 'rfc' and mentioned in cover letter that they
will be coming for real in stage III. Here they support patch 2
and show the future changes to bpf.h file.
Patches 1 and 2 are good to go.
Note that they're on top of Hannes's patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385266/
Do you want me to resubmit just first two?
Thanks