Re: [RFC v3 7/7] shm: isolate pinned pages when sealing files
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2014-06-13 15:06:31
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2014-06-13 15:06:31
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:36 AM, David Herrmann [off-list ref] wrote:
When setting SEAL_WRITE, we must make sure nobody has a writable reference to the pages (via GUP or similar). We currently check references and wait some time for them to be dropped. This, however, might fail for several reasons, including: - the page is pinned for longer than we wait - while we wait, someone takes an already pinned page for read-access Therefore, this patch introduces page-isolation. When sealing a file with SEAL_WRITE, we copy all pages that have an elevated ref-count. The newpage is put in place atomically, the old page is detached and left alone. It will get reclaimed once the last external user dropped it. Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <redacted>
Won't this have unexpected effects? Thread 1: start read into mapping backed by fd Thread 2: SEAL_WRITE Thread 1: read finishes. now the page doesn't match the sealed page Is this okay? Or am I missing something? Are there really things that keep unnecessary writable pins around? --Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>