Thread (35 messages) flat view 35 messages, 8 authors, 2011-10-17

Re: [PATCH, v10 3/3] cgroups: introduce timer slack controller

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-17 13:06:52
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 13:46 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:38:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
quoted
Unfortunately this is a full speed rolling trainwreck already. The
whole app space is made to encourage shitty applications. Android is
designed exactly in that way and it seems that all other desktop folks
have fully adopted that adsurdity.

Back when NOHZ was merged in the kernel, powertop made people fix crap
left and right in not time. Why should we add something which actively
fosters crappy applications today?
They're orthogonal. Sometimes you want timer-driven behaviour (how else 
are you going to draw animations?) and that's obviously going to 
generate wakeups. This is for the idle case, where the user is no longer 
sitting in front of the machine but you don't want to trigger a full 
system suspend. We either need every application that ever uses 
timer-driven behaviour to support setting its own timer slack on some 
sort of external policy decision, or we need a way to let the kernel 
force them to.
No!! you want that application to stop drawing stuff that is invisible.
Setting your own timerslack for something you know is pointless is worse
than doing something pointless, its down right stupid.

Please, work with the X folks and make it an error to draw to invisible
surfaces. And yes, I know that composition makes that a non-trivial
problem. But at least the blank screen case should be trivial, and I
suspect there's more tractable cases as well. Mostly the desktop is
still a very static place and a few extra timer ticks for when you're
spinning your desktop cube around isn't going to be a problem.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help