Re: [PATCH v3] introduce sys_syncfs to sync a single file system

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:10:01PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

Indan Zupancic wrote:

quoted

I'm not pushing for any official convention, just what seems good taste.

In cases like this, conventions (consistency and best practices) are
very important.

quoted

Less code added, less bloat. Architecture independent, no need to update
all system call tables everywhere (all archs, libc versions and strace).
Two files changed, instead of 7 (which only hooks up x86).

Thanks for explaining.  Those do seem like good reasons to use a ioctl
instead of a new syscall.

No, make it a syscall, it's more obvious and will be documented much
better.

thanks,

greg k-h