Re: [PATCH 2/2] Define ENONAMESERVICE and ENAMEUNKNOWN to indicate name service errors
- From
- David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Date
- 2011-03-08 16:37:20
- Also in
- linux-arch, lkml
- Reply to
- Alan Cox, 2011-03-08
Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
I was wondering if at least there was some co-ordination going on so that functions like perror() produced sensible answers. Otherwise it's debatable if its actually an improvement for the poor end user ?
Fair point. That's why I cc'd the messages to linux-api@, but I'm not sure who
actually reads it, besides Michael Kerrisk. I guess it's probably a good idea
to wave my suggestions on the glibc list at least.
David