On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:12:33PM +0800, Li, Shaohua wrote:

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 13:55 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:38:18 +0800 Shaohua Li [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

ext2, minix and probably others create an address_space for each
directory.  Heaven knows what xfs does (for example).

yes, this is for one directiory, but the all files's metadata are in
block_dev address_space.
I thought you mean there are several block_dev address_space like
address_space in some filesystems, which doesn't fit well in my
implementation. for ext like filesystem, there is only one
address_space. for filesystems with several address_space, my proposal
is map them to a virtual big address_space in the new ioctls.

ext2 and minixfs (and I think sysv and ufs) have a separate
address_space for each directory.  I don't see how those can be
represented with a single "virtual big address_space" - we also need
identifiers in there so each directory's address_space can be created
and appropriately populated.

Oh, I misunderstand your comments. you are right, the ioctl methods
don't work for ext2. the dir's address_space can't be readahead either.
Looks we could only do the metadata readahead in filesystem specific
way.

There should be little interest on ext2 boot time optimization.

However if necessary, we might somehow treat ext2 dirs as files and
do normal fadvise on them? The other ext2 metadata may still be
accessible via the block_dev interface.

Thanks,
Fengguang