On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:10:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:21:49 +0800 Shaohua Li [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

It seems to return a single offset/length tuple which refers to the
btrfs metadata "file", with the intent that this tuple later be fed
into a btrfs-specific readahead ioctl.

I can see how this might be used with say fatfs or ext3 where all
metadata resides within the blockdev address_space.  But how is a
filesytem which keeps its metadata in multiple address_spaces supposed
to use this interface?

Oh, this looks like a big problem, thanks for letting me know such
filesystems. is it possible specific filesystem mapping multiple
address_space ranges to a virtual big ranges? the new ioctls handle the
mapping.

I'm not sure what you mean by that.

ext2, minix and probably others create an address_space for each
directory.  Heaven knows what xfs does (for example).

In 2.6.39 it won't even use address spaces for metadata caching.

Besides, XFS already has pretty sophisticated metadata readahead
built in - it's one of the reasons why the XFS directory code scales
so well on cold cache lookups of arge directories - so I don't see
much need for such an interface for XFS.

Perhaps btrfs would be better served by implementing speculative
metadata readahead in the places where it makes sense (e.g. readdir)
bcause it will improve cold-cache performance on a much wider range
of workloads than at just boot-time....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com