Re: [PATCH v3 03/22] netconsole: Introduce 'enabled' state-machine
From: Mike Waychison <hidden>
Date: 2010-12-14 23:33:29
Also in:
lkml, netdev
2010/12/14 Michał Mirosław [off-list ref]:
2010/12/14 Mike Waychison [off-list ref]:quoted
Representing the internal state within netconsole isn't really a boolean value, but rather a state machine with transitions.[...]quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c index 6e16888..288a025 100644 --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c[...]quoted
@@ -350,9 +362,9 @@ static ssize_t store_enabled(struct netconsole_target *nt,err = netpoll_setup(&nt->np); spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock, flags); if (err) - nt->enabled = 0; + nt->np_state = NETPOLL_DISABLED; else - nt->enabled = 1; + nt->np_state = NETPOLL_ENABLED; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags); if (err) return err;[...] Since the spinlock protects only nt->np_state setting, you might be able to remove it altogether and use cmpxchg() where nt->np_state transitions from enabled or disabled state. Maybe the locking scheme just needs more thought altogether?
The target_list_lock protects the list, as well as the state transitions. This makes iterating through the list and getting a consistent view of the targets a lot easier when it comes time to transmitting packets we are guaranteed that nobody is changing the target state underneath us if nt->np_state == NETPOLL_ENABLED while we hold the lock.