Re: [RFC][v7][PATCH 8/9]: Define clone2() syscall

On Wednesday 30 September 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Let's just make it another system call.  It doesn't have any downside
that I can see, might prevent problems, and avoids setting a bad
precedent that someone can misinterpret.

One more argument for this is that the new code is architecture independent
using user_stack_pointer(), while the original sys_clone is highly
architecture specific, which is a source for bugs when trying to
extend it.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html