Re: [PATCH 00/80] Kernel based checkpoint/restart [v18]

* Dan Smith [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

Q: What additional work needs to be done to it?  A: Fill in the
gory details following the examples so far. Current WIP includes
inet sockets, event-poll, and early work on inotify, mount
namespace and mount-points, pseudo file systems

AM> Will this new code muck up the kernel, or will it be clean?

I have (and have previously posted) prototype code to do c/r of open 
sockets, ignoring some things like updating timers and such.  It looks 
rather similar to the existing UNIX bits, and is even easier in some 
ways.

One particular use case is only migrating listening sockets and 
allowing the connected ones to be reset upon restart.  That enables a 
bunch of things like apache, postfix, vncserver, and even sshd.  I 
will pull the listen-only bits out of my current patch, scrape off a 
little bitrot, and post them in a few days.

That looks useful. (Btw., the other four questions Andrew asked look 
relevant too.)

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>