Re: [RFC v8][PATCH 05/12] x86 support for checkpoint/restart
From: Oren Laadan <hidden>
Date: 2008-11-04 15:33:18
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Masahiko Takahashi wrote:
Hi Oren, I'm now trying to port your patchset to x86_64, and find a tiny inconsistency issue. On 2008-10-30 at 09:51 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:quoted
+/* dump the thread_struct of a given task */ +int cr_write_thread(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct task_struct *t) +{ + struct cr_hdr h; + struct cr_hdr_thread *hh = cr_hbuf_get(ctx, sizeof(*hh)); + struct thread_struct *thread; + struct desc_struct *desc; + int ntls = 0; + int n, ret; + + h.type = CR_HDR_THREAD; + h.len = sizeof(*hh); + h.parent = task_pid_vnr(t); + + thread = &t->thread; + + /* calculate no. of TLS entries that follow */ + desc = thread->tls_array; + for (n = GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES; n > 0; n--, desc++) { + if (desc->a || desc->b) + ntls++; + } + + hh->gdt_entry_tls_entries = GDT_ENTRY_TLS_ENTRIES; + hh->sizeof_tls_array = sizeof(thread->tls_array); + hh->ntls = ntls; + + ret = cr_write_obj(ctx, &h, hh); + cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret;Please add if (ntls == 0) return ret; because, in restart phase, reading TLS entries from the image file is skipped if hh->ntls == 0, which may incur inconsistency and fail to restart.
Will fix, thanks. Oren. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html