Thread (36 messages) 36 messages, 11 authors, 2008-10-28

Re: [RFC v7][PATCH 2/9] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart

From: Oren Laadan <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-27 11:04:12
Also in: linux-mm, lkml


Peter Chubb wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Oren" == Oren Laadan [off-list ref] writes:

Oren> Nope, since we will fail to restart in many cases. We will need
Oren> a way to move from caller's credentials to saved credentials,
Oren> and even from caller's credentials to privileged credentials
Oren> (e.g. to reopen a file that was created by a setuid program
Oren> prior to dropping privileges).

You can't necessarily tell the difference between this and revocation
of privilege.  For most security models, it must be possible to change
the permissions on the file, and then the restart should fail.

In our implementation, we simply refused to checkpoint setid programs.
True. And this works very well for HPC applications.

However, it doesn't work so well for server applications, for instance.

Also, you could use file system snapshotting to ensure that the file
system view does not change, and still face the same issue.

So I'm perfectly ok with deferring this discussion to a later time :)

Oren.
--
Dr Peter Chubb  http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au  peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au           ERTOS within National ICT Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help