From: Paolo Dovera <hidden> Date: 2003-09-28 19:55:09
Hello,
I successfully compiled all linux-2.6.0-testx before test6 on RH7.2
Alpha APX platform
Applied patch-2.6.0-test6 I receive the following error:
[root@alpha linux-2.6.0-test6]# make
make[1]: `arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x480): In function `try_to_wake_up':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x484): In function `try_to_wake_up':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x140c): In function `schedule':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x1410): In function `schedule':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x5068): In function `copy_process':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x506c): more undefined references to
`sched_clock' follow
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Do you have some suggestions?
Bye
Applied patch-2.6.0-test6 I receive the following error:
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x5068): In function `copy_process':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x506c): more undefined references to
`sched_clock' follow
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is supposed to return
a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy the
implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based on
jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle counter, but
it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken care of.
--
Falk
On Sunday 28 September 2003 23:51, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Paolo Dovera [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Applied patch-2.6.0-test6 I receive the following error:
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x5068): In function `copy_process':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x506c): more undefined references to
`sched_clock' follow
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is supposed to return
a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy the
implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based on
jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle counter, but
it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken care of.
Can post here a patch based on arm ?
I am courious to see it !
Eventualy post it on linux kernel list or to Richard Henderson ?
Thx a lot !
On Sunday 28 September 2003 23:51, Falk Hueffner wrote:
quoted
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is supposed to
return a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy
the implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based
on jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle
counter, but it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken
care of.
I've not tested this, it should work, but probably scheduling
behaviour will not be as good as it could be, although HZ being 1000
(or larger) on Alpha should help.
Eventualy post it on linux kernel list or to Richard Henderson ?
Not without testing it, and I have no time for that currently.
--
Falk
On Monday 29 September 2003 12:02, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Balint Cristian [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Sunday 28 September 2003 23:51, Falk Hueffner wrote:
quoted
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is supposed to
return a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy
the implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based
on jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle
counter, but it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken
care of.
Can post here a patch based on arm ?
Thx a lot !
I test it today on an miata machine, i tell the result on that list.
I've not tested this, it should work, but probably scheduling
behaviour will not be as good as it could be, although HZ being 1000
(or larger) on Alpha should help.
quoted
Eventualy post it on linux kernel list or to Richard Henderson ?
Not without testing it, and I have no time for that currently.
From: Oliver Pitzeier <hidden> Date: 2003-09-29 09:06:46
On Sunday 28 September 2003 23:51, Falk Hueffner wrote:
quoted
Paolo Dovera [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Applied patch-2.6.0-test6 I receive the following error:
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x5068): In function `copy_process':
: undefined reference to `sched_clock'
kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x506c): more undefined references to
`sched_clock' follow
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is
supposed to return
quoted
a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy the
implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based on
jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle
counter, but
quoted
it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken care of.
Can post here a patch based on arm ?
I am courious to see it !
Eventualy post it on linux kernel list or to Richard Henderson ?
Thx a lot !
Please take a look at the LKML. I had the same problem with -test6 and viro
already posted a workaround!
Best,
Oliver
From: Paolo Dovera <hidden> Date: 2003-09-29 18:05:10
Thanks^2 to you!
It works fine
I'm trying 2.6.0-test6 on Tsunami Alpha platform
Ciao,
Paolo
Falk Hueffner wrote:
quoted hunk
Balint Cristian [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Sunday 28 September 2003 23:51, Falk Hueffner wrote:
quoted
sched_clock is not implemented yet for Alpha. It is supposed to
return a high resolution timer. As workaround, you could just copy
the implementation from ARM, which simply returns the value based
on jiffies. Ideally, one would take into account the cycle
counter, but it wraps every few seconds, which has to be taken
care of.
}
+
+/*
+ * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
+ * Should probably take rpcc into account for improved resolution
+ */
+unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
+{
+ return (unsigned long long) jiffies * (1000000000 / HZ);
+}
I've not tested this, it should work, but probably scheduling
behaviour will not be as good as it could be, although HZ being 1000
(or larger) on Alpha should help.
quoted
Eventualy post it on linux kernel list or to Richard Henderson ?
Not without testing it, and I have no time for that currently.