RE: [RESEND PATCH v3 4/9] EDAC/ghes: Move ghes_edac.force_load to setup parameter
From: Justin He <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-25 09:43:00
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-edac, linux-efi, lkml
-----Original Message-----
[...]
quoted
+static int __init setup_ghes_edac_load(char *str) { + if (str) + if (!strcmp("true", str) || !strcmp("1", str)) + ghes_edac_force = true; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)) + ghes_edac_force = true; + + return 1; +} +__setup("ghes_edac_force=", setup_ghes_edac_load);Why all that? Isn't specifying ghes.edac_force_load
Ok, I will use module parameter ghes.edac_force_load.
on the kernel command line enough? I.e., you don't need to parse the passed in option - just the presence of the parameter is enough.quoted
+ static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(ghes_report_chain); static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes) @@ -1517,13 +1537,13 @@ static struct acpi_platform_list plat_list[] = { { } /* End */ }; -struct list_head *ghes_get_devices(bool force) +struct list_head *ghes_get_devices(void) { int idx = -1; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)) { idx = acpi_match_platform_list(plat_list); - if (idx < 0 && !force) + if (idx < 0 && !ghes_edac_force) return NULL; }diff --git a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c indexbb3ea42ba70b..6a2b54cc7240 100644--- a/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/ghes_edac.c@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(ghes_reg_mutex); */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ghes_lock); -/* "ghes_edac.force_load=1" skips the platform check */ -static bool__read_mostly force_load; -module_param(force_load, bool, 0); - static bool system_scanned; static struct list_head *ghes_devs;@@ -437,23 +433,12 @@ static int ghes_edac_register(struct device *dev) mci->ctl_name = "ghes_edac"; mci->dev_name = "ghes"; - if (fake) { - pr_info("This system has a very crappy BIOS: It doesn't even list theDIMMS.\n");quoted
- pr_info("Its SMBIOS info is wrong. It is doubtful that the error reportwould\n");quoted
- pr_info("work on such system. Use this driver with caution\n"); - } else if (force_load) { - pr_info("This EDAC driver relies on BIOS to enumerate memory andget error reports.\n");quoted
- pr_info("Unfortunately, not all BIOSes reflect the memory layoutcorrectly.\n");quoted
- pr_info("So, the end result of using this driver varies from vendor tovendor.\n");quoted
- pr_info("If you find incorrect reports, please contact your hardwarevendor\n");quoted
- pr_info("to correct its BIOS.\n"); - pr_info("This system has %d DIMM sockets.\n",ghes_hw.num_dimms);quoted
- } - if (!fake) { struct dimm_info *src, *dst; int i = 0; + pr_info("This system has %d DIMM sockets.\n",ghes_hw.num_dimms);quoted
+ mci_for_each_dimm(mci, dst) { src = &ghes_hw.dimms[i];This hunk...
Sorry, should move pr_info after this line
quoted
@@ -478,6 +463,17 @@ static int ghes_edac_register(struct device *dev) } else { struct dimm_info *dimm = edac_get_dimm(mci, 0, 0, 0); + pr_info("This system has a very crappy BIOS: It doesn't even list theDIMMS.\n");quoted
+ pr_info("Its SMBIOS info is wrong. It is doubtful that the error reportwould\n");quoted
+ pr_info("work on such system. Use this driver with caution\n"); + + if (ghes_edac_force) { + pr_info("This EDAC driver relies on BIOS to enumerate memoryand get\n");quoted
+ pr_info("error reports. Unfortunately, not all BIOSes reflectthe\n");quoted
+ pr_info("memory layout correctly. If you find incorrect reports,please\n");quoted
+ pr_info("contact your hardware vendor for its in correctBIOS.\n");quoted
+ } + dimm->nr_pages = 1; dimm->grain = 128; dimm->mtype = MEM_UNKNOWN;... and this hunk look unrelated to what this patch is doing. What are they for?
I tried to keep the previous same logic. if (fake) print_something - !fake && ghes not preferred. print_otherthings -- Cheers, Justin (Jia He)