On 2021/10/13 17:02, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:

quoted

Hi Arnd,

On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning:

WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc
The function next_platform_timer() references
the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc.
This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata
annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong.

This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined
despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue,
and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems
better anyway.

There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1],
but not merged yet.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/ (local)

My bad, we did not coordinate well - I noticed your Acked-by but as a
rule we should also CC LAKML and Catalin/Will (if they aren't CCed) on
the reply to make sure they can actually see it.

It's my bad. I will make sure LAKML and Catalin/Will are CCed next time
when I reply the email.

Thanks
Hanjun