Re: [PATCH 7/8] cxl/port: Introduce cxl_port objects
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-12 06:36:34
Also in:
linux-cxl, linux-pci, lkml
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:23 AM Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2021 15:51:58 -0700 Dan Williams [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Once the cxl_root is established then other ports in the hierarchy can be attached. The cxl_port object, unlike cxl_root that is associated with host bridges, is associated with PCIe Root Ports or PCIe Switch Ports. Add cxl_port instances for all PCIe Root Ports in an ACPI0016 host bridge. The cxl_port instances for PCIe Switch Ports are not included here as those are to be modeled as another service device registered on the pcie_port_bus_type. A sample sysfs topology for a single-host-bridge with single-PCIe/CXL-port follows: /sys/bus/cxl/devices/root0 ├── address_space0 │ ├── devtype │ ├── end │ ├── start │ ├── supports_ram │ ├── supports_type2 │ ├── supports_type3 │ └── uevent ├── address_space1 │ ├── devtype │ ├── end │ ├── start │ ├── supports_pmem │ ├── supports_type2 │ ├── supports_type3 │ └── uevent ├── devtype ├── port1 │ ├── devtype │ ├── host -> ../../../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0016:00 │ ├── port2 │ │ ├── devtype │ │ ├── host -> ../../../../../pci0000:34/0000:34:00.0 │ │ ├── subsystem -> ../../../../../../bus/cxl │ │ ├── target_id │ │ └── uevent │ ├── subsystem -> ../../../../../bus/cxl │ ├── target_id │ └── uevent ├── subsystem -> ../../../../bus/cxl ├── target_id └── uevent In this listing the system-wide-singleton root0 has 2 address spaces, 1 PMEM and 1 RAM. Those address spaces are accessed through port1 which represents the upstream port of an ACPI0016 host-bridge. A multi-host-bridge system would have other ports as peers to port1 to additionally decode root level address spaces. Port2 in this diagram represents the single downstream port of the host-bridge. Were it to be a multi-ported-host-bridge there would be peers / siblings of port2 with port1 as their common ancestor.I guess it would be a pain to emulate a system that actually had multiple ports at the last level. Pity as would have made your explanation here a little easier to follow.
A pain in QEMU, but maybe not with a mocked implementation similar to what gets injected for the nvdimm "nfit_test". I'll take a look.
quoted
The rationale for this port hierarchy is to be able to walk the HDM decoder register sets that each port implements. Additionally it provides a representation of host-bridge interleave which will be necessary for follow-on work that adds CXL region devices. The details in the /sys/bus/cxl hierarchy that are not suitable to be represented in the /sys/bus/pci hierarchy are: - memory address spaces that are interleaved across host bridges - common sub-device functionality represented by CXL component + device registers (enumerated via DVSEC or platform firmware (ACPI CEDT)).I'm sold :)
Thanks for the vote of confidence. It sounded like Bjorn was sold too at the end of our last thread... I'll Cc him on this patch directly in the resend.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <redacted>Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Thanks for the review Jonathan, appreciate it.