Hi Sakari

On 02/01/2021 17:24, Sakari Ailus wrote:

On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 05:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

quoted

Hi Sakari

On 02/01/2021 17:07, Sakari Ailus wrote:

quoted

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS                         4

This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead?

Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and
media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the
moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from
the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h

Which do you prefer?

Seems you got answers already... :-) splitting the header in two seems good
to me. But IMO it doesn't have to be a part of this set.

Yeah I've been hesitating over this; if we chose not to do it in this
set though, how would you want me to deal with the double definition of
CIO2_NUM_PORTS

The patch is here:

<URL:https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20201230204405.62892-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/>

I guess Andy forgot to cc you.

Ah - thanks, I'd not read back through the list yet. I'll look at this
tonight then.