Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] PCI: thunder-pem: Allow to probe PEM-specific register range for ACPI case
From: Tomasz Nowicki <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-23 10:53:16
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
Hi Bjorn, On 21.09.2016 21:18, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:58:22AM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:quoted
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:05:49PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:quoted
quoted
The existing x86 practice is to use PNP0C02 devices for this purpose, and I think we should just follow that practice. ... My point is that the hard-coding should not be buried in a driver where it's invisible to the rest of the kernel. If we hard-code it in a quirk that adds _CRS entries, then the kernel will work just like it would if the firmware had been correct in the first place. The resource will appear in /sys/devices/pnp*/*/resources and /proc/iomem, and if we ever used _SRS to assign or move ACPI devices, we would know to avoid the bridge resource.Are you suggesting to add code similar to functions in linux/drivers/pnp/quirks.c to declare/attach the additional resource that the host need to have when the resource is not in MCFG table?Yes, but what I'm suggesting is actually a little stronger. This has nothing to do with whether a resource is in the MCFG table or not. I'm suggesting ACPI firmware should always describe the resource. If the firmware is defective and doesn't describe it, we should add a quirk in pnp/quirks.c to add a resource for it.
Thanks for pointers Bjorn. ThunderX is the case where we cannot change firmware, also it has no PNP0c02 device in tables. So in order to use pnp/quirks.c we would have to fabricate PNP0c02 in kernel and then add quirk entry. I am looking for the best place to put such emulation code but it seems not trivial. Thanks, Tomasz