Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/NFIT: Update Control Region Structure to comply ACPI 6.1
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-01 18:14:37
Also in:
lkml, nvdimm
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Toshi Kani [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 16:03 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:quoted
We have a bunch of macros in include/acmacros.h -- like this: ACPI_MOVE_16_TO_16(d, s)There is a problem in using the ACPICA byte-swap macros. ACPI is little- endian arch, so the macros are set to perform byte-swappings when the CPU arch is big-endian. This case, however, is the other way around. The fields in question are defined & stored as arrays of bytes. If you treat them as multi-bytes numeric values, then you need to byte-swap them when the CPU arch is little-endian because arrays of bytes have the same addressing as big-endian. Another issue is that it is not clear who needs to perform the byte- swapping among ACPICA and drivers. If ACPICA, drivers must agree that these fields are always treated as multi-bytes numeric values despite of the spec. If drivers, we need to make sure that only a single driver performs this byte-swapping one time as ACPI tables are global structures. I think it is much clearer to define the structure according to the ACPI spec.
I think the "ACPI tables are little-endian" assumption is pervasive throughout the implementation. Toshi, it seems all we need is conversions like: - sprintf(buf, "%#x\n", dcr->vendor_id); + sprintf(buf, "%#x\n", le16_to_cpu(dcr->vendor_id)); ...for the values exported to userspace through sysfs, but otherwise leave the base table definitions as is. Will this suffice?