RE: [PATCH 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Add function to remove ACPI tables
From: Zheng, Lv <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-19 03:19:42
Also in:
kexec, linux-efi, lkml
Hi,
From: Matt Fleming [mailto:matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org] Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPICA: Tables: Add function to remove ACPI tables On Thu, 18 Feb, at 09:15:28PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
Actually, the reason is that, as a rule, the process for ACPICA patches is that they first go to upstream ACPICA and they are acquired by Linux from there. While there are some exceptions from that process, there also are good reasons for that process to be followed, including the licensing one mentioned by Lv. All that said, Matt, if you agree that the patch can be applied under the BSD license, I think we can offer help with converting it to the upstream ACPICA coding conventions and applying it there. Lv, would you be able to take care of that?I don't have any problem with that, but can we hold off on this patch for now? There's another approach to fixing the BGRT issue with kexec that's being discussed which would supersede this, https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160218141544.GH2651-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org Assuming this patch does get picked up again, I'm happy to respin it against upstream ACPICA, but how do I go about getting dependent patches merged, PATCH 2/2 in this case?
[Lv Zheng] I can help to port your code to the ACPICA upstream. Rafael can help to merge the linuxized ported patch and the PATCH 2/2 if you want this solution to be upstreamed now. Or you can wait and submit PATCH 2/2 again. PATCH 1/2 should be a part of ACPICA 201603xx release I think. Thanks and best regards -Lv