Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2016-01-13

Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86, memhp, numa: Online memory-less nodes at boot time.

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-01-08 18:28:12
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

Hello,

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:20:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
+static void __init init_memory_less_node(int nid)
 {
+	unsigned long zones_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
+	unsigned long zholes_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0};
It doesn't cause any functional difference but it's a bit weird to use
{0} because it explicitly says to initialize the first element to 0
when the whole array needs to be cleared.  Wouldnt { } make more sense?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index e23a9e7..9c4d4d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -736,6 +736,7 @@ static inline bool is_dev_zone(const struct zone *zone)
 
 extern struct mutex zonelists_mutex;
 void build_all_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone);
+void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat);
This isn't used in this patch.  Contamination?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help