Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

[RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
[PATCH 1/4] x86/wakeup/sleep: Check whether the TSS GDT descriptor is empty before using it. · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/wakeup/sleep: Check whether the TSS GDT descriptor is empty before using it. · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/wakeup/sleep: Check whether the TSS GDT descriptor is empty before using it. · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/wakeup/sleep: Check whether the TSS GDT descriptor is empty before using it. · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/wakeup/sleep: Check whether the TSS GDT descriptor is empty before using it. · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2013-01-18
[PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-17
Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for load_idt (sidt). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2013-01-18
[PATCH 4/4] xen/acpi: Prep saved_context cr3 values. · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen/acpi: Prep saved_context cr3 values. · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2013-01-18
[PATCH 3/4] xen/lowlevel: Implement pvop call for store_gdt (gidt) · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-17
Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-17
Re: Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-17
RE: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Dan Magenheimer <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
RE: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Dan Magenheimer <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Stefano Stabellini <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-18
Is: Xen architecture document. Was: Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-19
Re: Is: Xen architecture document. Was: Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-19
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · David Vrabel <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org> · 2012-10-18
Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · David Vrabel <hidden> · 2012-10-18
Re: Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2012-10-17
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Ben Guthro <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Ben Guthro <hidden> · 2012-10-17
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2012-10-19
Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). · Ben Guthro <hidden> · 2012-10-20

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-17 16:22:45
Also in: lkml, xen-devel

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 09:03:12AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

On 10/17/2012 06:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

quoted

Note: These are the other patches that went in 3.7-rc1:
xen/bootup: allow {read|write}_cr8 pvops call [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/10/339]
xen/bootup: allow read_tscp call for Xen PV guests. [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/10/340]

So WTF do we have a read_tscp PV call?  Again, if there isn't a user
we should just axe it...

Let me spin off a patch to see if that can be done.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help