Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 7 authors, 2012-05-15

Re: [RFC PATCH] usb/acpi: Add support usb port power off mechanism for device fixed on the motherboard

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2012-05-12 00:17:26

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:59:22PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
quoted
quoted
Only the xHCI host controller will have the port power off mechanism.
You're only talking about the upcoming Intel implementation, right?
Yes.  The port power off mechanism is an Intel specific ACPI call.
AFAIK, there isn't anyone else who is going to have this mechanism.
That's not fair, you don't know what other vendors are going to do in
their controllers, or their system firmware, to be able to accurately say
this.
quoted
quoted
quoted
And what about ports on the USB-2 "rate-matching" hubs that Intel now
builds into its chipsets?
For the Intel platform that has the port power off mechanism, there are
EHCI host controllers, but the port switch over changes *all* the USB
ports under xHCI.
Leaving aside the matter of people who don't use the port switch-over, 
what about other platforms?
I'm not sure about other future Intel chipsets, like server chipsets.
As I said, I don't think the port power off mechanism will save servers
a large percentage of their power budget.  I don't think there's any
plans to add the port power off mechanism to EHCI.
Power savings mean more in real dollars to server systems than to mobile
systems.  So don't be supprised to see this show up on some server
systems, especially with the wide range of "custom" motherboards that
people are creating for large "cloud" data centers.

Never say never :)

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help