quoted

quoted

On 12.12.11 at 18:29, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:24:23AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

On 30.11.11 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [off-list ref] wrote:

--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile

@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o
 # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
 processor-y			:= processor_driver.o processor_throttling.o
 processor-y			+= processor_idle.o processor_thermal.o
+processor-y			+= processor_xen.o

This should minimally be processor-$(CONFIG_XEN), with other things
adjusted as necessary.

I was under the impression that this was required to get the 
processor_xen.ko
to be a module. Otherwise it would only compile as built-in.

processor_xen.ko? Why not have all the code go into processor.ko?
(And the original construct didn't aim in that direction either.)

Jan