On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:29:21PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:

Hello,

There was no response for the following patches and I'm planning on
routing them through workqueue#for-2.6.39.  If you have an objection
or want to take the patch through a different tree, please let me
know.

 0006-acpi-kacpi-_wq-don-t-need-WQ_MEM_RECLAIM.patch
 0007-cpufreq-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-workqueue.patch
 0012-i2o-use-alloc_workqueue-instead-of-create_workqueue.patch
 0013-misc-iwmc3200top-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-.patch
 0016-scsi-be2iscsi-qla2xxx-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
 0018-scsi-scsi_tgt_lib-scsi_tgtd-isn-t-used-in-memory-rec.patch
 0019-usb-ueagle-atm-use-system_wq-instead-of-dedicated-wo.patch
 0025-ext4-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
 0026-ocfs2-use-system_wq-instead-of-ocfs2_quota_wq.patch
 0027-reiserfs-make-commit_wq-use-the-default-concurrency-.patch
 0028-xfs-convert-to-alloc_workqueue.patch
 0029-net-9p-use-system_wq-instead-of-p9_mux_wq.patch
 0030-net-9p-replace-p9_poll_task-with-a-work.patch
 0031-rds-ib-use-system_wq-instead-of-rds_ib_fmr_wq.patch

Patches applied to wq#for-2.6.39 w/ collected acks added.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun