Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2008-06-27

Re: [patch 04/10] acpi: adjust _acpi_{module,function}_namedefinitions

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-06-27 05:01:15

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:20:26 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
In the future, please simply do not accept
patches to drivers/acpi/*/* (the ACPICA files) into -mm.
Nope.
Instead, bounce them to the Linux/ACPI maintainer,
who will bounce them to the ACPICA maintainer --
which is the head of the stream for these sub-directories.
One of the things I do is to act as backup for leaky maintainers.  Many
years experience with hundreds of maintainers teaches me that they all
leak like sieves.  Stuff which we *want* in the kernel would just get
lost if we relied upon maintainers to be 100% lossless.

Now, if both the Linux/ACPI maintainer and the ACPICA maintainer were
lossless then OK, but that would be unprecedented in my experience. 
Even the best of the best (Mauro Chehab) loses stuff occasionally.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help