Re: Re: S3 wakeup broken by one commit (was Re: bisect gives strange answer)
From: Sanjoy Mahajan <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-11 14:35:02
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:quoted
I'm happy to test. Do you mean that I should patch kernels starting with 299de0343c7d18448a69c635378342e9214b14af? Earlier kernels resume fine, so I wouldn't notice a change even if the patch was helping.
I thought the problem was fixed in 2.6.13-rc5-git2 (and presumably later kernels), according to the last comment at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4989.
Right, it is fixed. So I was wondering what tests Greg thinks are worth running. For example, maybe your patch plus Greg's patch work fine when both are used, in which case I should test one of the later kernels with that combination. -Sanjoy p.s. Sorry about the wrong lkml address that probably made lots of your CC'ed replies bounce. Now fixed I hoppe. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf