Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2005-08-08

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-rc4 1/2] fix possible null pointer access - acpi_pci_irq_enable

From: Kenji Kaneshige <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-08 04:24:09

Hi,
quoted
quoted
Should people be passing NULLs here, anyway? Is not the right fix to
remove the check, and remove the (!dev) check, too, and just fix the
callers? People are going to fix the oops, but noone is going to see
that ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT...
As you said, I think people should not pass NULLs here, and we should
fix the caller. But I think it is not bad to check (!dev) and (!dev->bus)
in these functions instead of panic. How about using WARN_ON here to
notify people of badness?

No, just read l-k archives. Just dereference it. It wil oops in a nice
way, and developer *will* see and fix it.
OK. I'll make a new patch that removes the check.

Andrew, could you please drop the following two patches from -mm tree?

   o fix-possible-null-pointer-access-acpi_pci_irq_enable.patch
   o fix-possible-null-pointer-access-acpi_pci_irq_disable.patch

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help