On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 15:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 12:46 pm, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:17:25AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Here's a patch to do it that way, if you prefer. acpi_system_save_state()
isn't defined before use, so you get a warning about that, which I didn't
bother to fix (I expect x86 probably sees the same warning).
I think you mean this, yes?
(note that CONFIG_X86 was redundant since CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP depends on
it)
-Len
===== drivers/acpi/system.c 1.16 vs edited =====
--- 1.16/drivers/acpi/system.c Sun Feb 15 06:38:17 2004
+++ edited/drivers/acpi/system.c Sat Mar 6 00:57:18 2004
@@ -41,14 +41,18 @@
#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
#include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
#include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
-#endif
-#endif
+acpi_status acpi_system_save_state(u32);
+#else
+static inline acpi_status acpi_system_save_state(u32 state)
+{
+ return AE_OK;
+}
+#endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_SYSTEM_COMPONENT
ACPI_MODULE_NAME ("acpi_system")
-------------------------------------------------------This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click