Re: Battery status reading problems

Markus Gaugusch wrote:

On Sep 18, Jan Rychter [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Reading the battery status still consumes insane amounts of CPU time

Recently, a bug has been fixed by some nice person at intel - the AML code
was executed twice. Although half of the time is still not perfect, it is
a lot better now.

But on Windows, there is no slowdown noticeable. Is that just the different implementation or is there still something (too) slow in the Intel ACPI CA code?

Bas.





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf