RE: [ACPI] _PDC method in DSDT
From: Arjan van de Ven <hidden>
Date: 2003-06-23 07:59:11
On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 09:11, Grover, Andrew wrote:
However, since the recently added non-vendor-supported Pentium M cpufreq driver uses hardcoded tables and cpuid instead of relying on ACPI for this information anyways, adding _PDC support to processor.c would not affect its behavior. If that driver were changed to use ACPI for determining platform capabilities, like Windows and our released binary driver do, then yes, adding _PDC support would be important.
Intel is more than welcome to release the linux driver under the GPL :)
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes