tir, 06.05.2003 kl. 14.36 skrev Ducrot Bruno:
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:01:48PM +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:
quoted
tir, 06.05.2003 kl. 13.20 skrev Ducrot Bruno:
quoted
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:29:46AM +0200, Stian Jordet wrote:
quoted
Hi,
Since kernel 2.5.69, usb no longer work with acpi on my computer. With
2.5.68 it did. Do you know what changes you have done might cause this?
I get this error, but this one is with both .68 and .69.
ACPI-0109: *** Error: No object was returned from
[\_SB_.PCI0.PX40.IRDA._STA] (Node dff5cc80), AE_NOT_EXIST
A pointer to your DSDT will be appreciate...
I'm probably just stupid, but I have been searching a bit, and I can't
seem to find information about how to find it anywhere.. With 2.4 it was
under /proc/acpi, but not in 2.5.. Hmm..
Ok. I must admit I don't know for 2.5. Then just grab acpidump
from sf'cvs :
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous-CZy7tVeV0kv+F7Cq6hUZDNHuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org:/cvsroot/acpi login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous-CZy7tVeV0kv+F7Cq6hUZDNHuzzzSOjJt@public.gmane.org:/cvsroot/acpi co acpidump
then, in acpidump directory, do a make and a
./acpidump -b DSDT > dsdt
then send me a gzipped version to this one (or place a pointer in www,
ftp, etc.).
Thanks :)
quoted
quoted
quoted
This is a Asus CUV266-DLS smp motherboard, and thus I need acpi to power
it off, and it would have been very, very much apprpeciated if this
somehow could be fixed before 2.6, atleast. I don't want to be running
2.5.68 for ever :)
Stupid question: does USB work without ACPI?
It does indeed (with MPS1.4 disabled). But it has worked with at least
the 15 last 2.5.x kernels...
IMHO, it is likely to be a problem with IRQ and IO-APIC. Andy should
answer more on this than me. But I guess that at first a
cat /proc/interrupts
may help (with and without acpi), and with attached dmesgs.
You are most likely right, it is a irq problem for sure. When you look
at the atteched /proc/interrupts, you can see that 2.5.69 with acpi, the
usb host-controller doesn't get interrupts.
I just hope Andy has the time to look at this, but since I'm obviously
the only one getting hit by this, I don't have my hopes to high :( But
since it worked in .68, it shouldn't be impossible.
And I really appreciate some feedback :) Thanks.
Best regards,
Stian