Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2003-02-16

Re: Sneaking patches in (was Re: System hang when trying to enter sleep/standby state)

From: Patrick Mochel <hidden>
Date: 2003-02-16 23:57:58

Are we playing patch wars or what?
Not at all. The changes were discussed and sent to Andy, who had me 
forward them to Linus. The issue in question - disallowing the user from 
entering S5 directly from /proc/acpi/sleep was discussed on the list, and 
Andy agreed that it should be removed. 
I have not seen any patch on the lists, *and*
you also moved big blocks of code to hide your
changes. That's pretty nasty behaviour.
That's not true. The patch to make that change is here: 

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=104508487609853&w=2

And the accusation about moving large blocks of code to cover it up is 
completely unfair. It's not a conspiracy. 

It was also explained, along with every other change in the changelog
entries. I know that you are opposed to using BitKeeper, so I recommend 
that you subscribe to, or read, the bk-commits-head list, which has every 
patch Linus commits, with diffstat output and full changelogs for each. 

You can find info here: 

http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html

and an archive here:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bk-commits-head&r=1&w=2

FYI, there is also a bk-commits-24 for 2.4 commits by Marcelo.

	-pat






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help