[PATCH 0/2] KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 · Ricardo Koller <hidden> · 2021-09-03
[PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent · Ricardo Koller <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent · Andrew Jones <hidden> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent · Oliver Upton <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent · Maciej S. Szmigiero <hidden> · 2021-09-12
[PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Ricardo Koller <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Andrew Jones <hidden> · 2021-09-06
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Ricardo Koller <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Oliver Upton <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Ricardo Koller <hidden> · 2021-09-07
Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 · Maciej S. Szmigiero <hidden> · 2021-09-12

Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64

From: Oliver Upton <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-07 14:39:30
Also in: kvmarm

Ricardo,

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Ricardo Koller [off-list ref] wrote:

Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list
of aarch64 selftests.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <redacted>

There isn't anything that prevents these tests from being used for
s390x too right? Of course, we haven't anything to test on but just a
thought.

Besides Drew's comments:

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <redacted>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help