Re: [PATCH v10 05/17] vhost-vdpa: Fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() on reset failure
From: Yongji Xie <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-03 09:51:02
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, lkml, netdev
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:10 PM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
在 2021/7/29 下午3:34, Xie Yongji 写道:quoted
Re-read the device status to ensure it's set to zero during resetting. Otherwise, fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() after timeout. Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <redacted> --- drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c index b07aa161f7ad..dd05c1e1133c 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp) struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa; const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config; u8 status, status_old; - int nvqs = v->nvqs; + int timeout = 0, nvqs = v->nvqs; u16 i; if (copy_from_user(&status, statusp, sizeof(status)))@@ -173,6 +173,15 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp) return -EINVAL; ops->set_status(vdpa, status); + if (status == 0) { + while (ops->get_status(vdpa)) { + timeout += 20; + if (timeout > VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS) + return -EIO; + + msleep(20); + }Spec has introduced the reset a one of the basic facility. And consider we differ reset here. This makes me think if it's better to introduce a dedicated vdpa ops for reset?
Do you mean replace the ops.set_status(vdev, 0) with the ops.reset()? Then we can remove the timeout processing which is device specific stuff. Thanks, Yongji