Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
From: Brijesh Singh <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 15:47:56
Also in:
linux-coco, linux-efi, linux-mm, lkml, platform-driver-x86
On 8/27/21 10:18 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:19:27AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:quoted
From: Michael Roth <redacted> This adds support for utilizing the SEV-SNP-validated CPUID table ins/This adds support for utilizing/Utilize/ Yap, it can really be that simple. :)quoted
the various #VC handler routines used throughout boot/run-time. Mostly this is handled by re-using the CPUID lookup code introduced earlier for the boot/compressed kernel, but at various stages of boot some work needs to be done to ensure the CPUID table is set up and remains accessible throughout. The following init routines are introduced to handle this:Do not talk about what your patch does - that should hopefully be visible in the diff itself. Rather, talk about *why* you're doing what you're doing.quoted
sev_snp_cpuid_init():This one is not really introduced - it is already there. <snip all the complex rest> So this patch is making my head spin. It seems we're dancing a lot of dance just to have our CPUID page present at all times. Which begs the question: do we need it during the whole lifetime of the guest?
Mike can correct me, we need it for entire lifetime of the guest. Whenever guest needs the CPUID value, the #VC handler will refer to this page.
Regardless, I think this can be simplified by orders of magnitude if we allocated statically 4K for that CPUID page in arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem_encrypt.S, copied the supplied CPUID page from the firmware to it and from now on, work with our own copy.
Actually a VMM could populate more than one page for the CPUID. One page can include 64 entries and I believe Mike is already running into limits (with Qemu) and exploring the ideas to extend it more than a page.
You probably would need to still remap it for kernel proper but it would get rid of all that crazy in this patch here. Hmmm?