Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2021-07-23

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/5] lib: s390x: uv: Add offset comments to uv_query and extend it

From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-06-30 09:43:27
Also in: linux-s390

On 6/30/21 11:06 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29 2021, Janosch Frank [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The struct is getting longer, let's add offset comments so we know
where we change things when we add struct members.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 lib/s390x/asm/uv.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
index 96a2a7e..5ff98b8 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
@@ -86,22 +86,23 @@ struct uv_cb_init {
 } __attribute__((packed))  __attribute__((aligned(8)));
 
 struct uv_cb_qui {
-	struct uv_cb_header header;
-	uint64_t reserved08;
-	uint64_t inst_calls_list[4];
-	uint64_t reserved30[2];
-	uint64_t uv_base_stor_len;
-	uint64_t reserved48;
-	uint64_t conf_base_phys_stor_len;
-	uint64_t conf_base_virt_stor_len;
-	uint64_t conf_virt_var_stor_len;
-	uint64_t cpu_stor_len;
-	uint32_t reserved70[3];
-	uint32_t max_num_sec_conf;
-	uint64_t max_guest_stor_addr;
-	uint8_t  reserved88[158 - 136];
-	uint16_t max_guest_cpus;
-	uint8_t  reserveda0[200 - 160];
+	struct uv_cb_header header;		/* 0x0000 */
+	uint64_t reserved08;			/* 0x0008 */
+	uint64_t inst_calls_list[4];		/* 0x0010 */
+	uint64_t reserved30[2];			/* 0x0030 */
+	uint64_t uv_base_stor_len;		/* 0x0040 */
+	uint64_t reserved48;			/* 0x0048 */
+	uint64_t conf_base_phys_stor_len;	/* 0x0050 */
+	uint64_t conf_base_virt_stor_len;	/* 0x0058 */
+	uint64_t conf_virt_var_stor_len;	/* 0x0060 */
+	uint64_t cpu_stor_len;			/* 0x0068 */
+	uint32_t reserved70[3];			/* 0x0070 */
+	uint32_t max_num_sec_conf;		/* 0x007c */
+	uint64_t max_guest_stor_addr;		/* 0x0080 */
+	uint8_t  reserved88[158 - 136];		/* 0x0088 */
+	uint16_t max_guest_cpus;		/* 0x009e */
+	uint64_t uv_feature_indications;	/* 0x00a0 */
+	uint8_t  reserveda0[200 - 168];		/* 0x00a8 */
Should this rather be reserveda8? The other reserveds encode their
position properly.

Oops
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help