Re: [RFC Part2 PATCH 05/30] x86: define RMP violation #PF error code
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-25 14:35:04
Also in:
linux-crypto, lkml
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-25 14:35:04
Also in:
linux-crypto, lkml
On 3/25/21 7:32 AM, Brijesh Singh wrote:
quoted
quoted
enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_PROT = 1 << 0,@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, + X86_PF_RMP = 1ull << 31, };
...
quoted
Could we at least start declaring these with BIT()?Sure, I can bit the BIT() macro to define the bits. Do you want me to update all of the fault codes to use BIT() or just the one I am adding in this patch ?
Please update all of them for consistency.