Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 4 authors, 2021-02-16

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/17] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support

From: Arseny Krasnov <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-15 09:12:48
Also in: lkml, netdev

On 11.02.2021 15:27, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 06:16:12PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
quoted
This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support:
1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type.
2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <redacted>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index a033d3340ac4..c77998a14018 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
		new_transport = transport_dgram;
		break;
	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
		if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid))
			new_transport = transport_local;
		else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g ||
@@ -459,6 +460,15 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
			new_transport = transport_g2h;
		else
			new_transport = transport_h2g;
+
+		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
+			if (!new_transport ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_len ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_eor ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_get_len ||
+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_dequeue)
+				return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
+		}
Maybe we should move this check after the try_module_get() call, since 
the memory pointed by 'new_transport' pointer can be deallocated in the 
meantime.

Also, if the socket had a transport before, we should deassign it before 
returning an error.
I think previous transport is deassigned immediately after this

'switch()' on sk->sk_type:

if (vsk->transport) {

    ...

    vsock_deassign_transport(vsk);

}


Ok, check will be moved after 'try_module_get()'.
quoted
		break;
	default:
		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
@@ -684,6 +694,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
	switch (sk->sk_socket->type) {
	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
		spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
		retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr);
		spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
@@ -769,7 +780,7 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
static bool sock_type_connectible(u16 type)
{
-	return type == SOCK_STREAM;
+	return (type == SOCK_STREAM) || (type == SOCK_SEQPACKET);
}

static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level)
@@ -2199,6 +2210,27 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
};

+static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
+	.family = PF_VSOCK,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.release = vsock_release,
+	.bind = vsock_bind,
+	.connect = vsock_connect,
+	.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
+	.accept = vsock_accept,
+	.getname = vsock_getname,
+	.poll = vsock_poll,
+	.ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+	.listen = vsock_listen,
+	.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
+	.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
+	.getsockopt = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
+	.sendmsg = vsock_connectible_sendmsg,
+	.recvmsg = vsock_connectible_recvmsg,
+	.mmap = sock_no_mmap,
+	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
+};
+
static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
			int protocol, int kern)
{
@@ -2219,6 +2251,9 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
	case SOCK_STREAM:
		sock->ops = &vsock_stream_ops;
		break;
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
+		sock->ops = &vsock_seqpacket_ops;
+		break;
	default:
		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
	}
-- 
2.25.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help