Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/17] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support
From: Arseny Krasnov <hidden>
Date: 2021-02-15 09:12:48
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On 11.02.2021 15:27, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 06:16:12PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:quoted
This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support: 1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type. 2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type. Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <redacted> --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index a033d3340ac4..c77998a14018 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)new_transport = transport_dgram; break; case SOCK_STREAM: + case SOCK_SEQPACKET: if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid)) new_transport = transport_local; else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g ||@@ -459,6 +460,15 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)new_transport = transport_g2h; else new_transport = transport_h2g; + + if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) { + if (!new_transport || + !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_len || + !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_eor || + !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_get_len || + !new_transport->seqpacket_dequeue) + return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT; + }Maybe we should move this check after the try_module_get() call, since the memory pointed by 'new_transport' pointer can be deallocated in the meantime. Also, if the socket had a transport before, we should deassign it before returning an error.
I think previous transport is deassigned immediately after this
'switch()' on sk->sk_type:
if (vsk->transport) {
...
vsock_deassign_transport(vsk);
}
Ok, check will be moved after 'try_module_get()'.
quoted
break; default: return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;@@ -684,6 +694,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)switch (sk->sk_socket->type) { case SOCK_STREAM: + case SOCK_SEQPACKET: spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock); retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr); spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);@@ -769,7 +780,7 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,static bool sock_type_connectible(u16 type) { - return type == SOCK_STREAM; + return (type == SOCK_STREAM) || (type == SOCK_SEQPACKET); } static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level)@@ -2199,6 +2210,27 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage, }; +static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = { + .family = PF_VSOCK, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .release = vsock_release, + .bind = vsock_bind, + .connect = vsock_connect, + .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair, + .accept = vsock_accept, + .getname = vsock_getname, + .poll = vsock_poll, + .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl, + .listen = vsock_listen, + .shutdown = vsock_shutdown, + .setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt, + .getsockopt = vsock_connectible_getsockopt, + .sendmsg = vsock_connectible_sendmsg, + .recvmsg = vsock_connectible_recvmsg, + .mmap = sock_no_mmap, + .sendpage = sock_no_sendpage, +}; + static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol, int kern) {@@ -2219,6 +2251,9 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,case SOCK_STREAM: sock->ops = &vsock_stream_ops; break; + case SOCK_SEQPACKET: + sock->ops = &vsock_seqpacket_ops; + break; default: return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT; } -- 2.25.1