Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops overhead
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-01-15 13:58:30
Also in:
lkml
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-01-15 13:58:30
Also in:
lkml
On 15/01/21 10:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:27:56PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 5060922..9d4492b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm); static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(struct kvm *kvm) { if (kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush && - !kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush(kvm)) + !static_call(kvm_x86_tlb_remote_flush)(kvm)) return 0; else return -ENOTSUPP;Would you be able to use something like this? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110101307.GO2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net we could also add __static_call_return1(), if that would help.
I think I'd rather make the default callee return -ENOTSUPP directly and remove the "if" completely. So __static_call_return1() is not particularly useful here. Paolo