Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache when possible
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-28 13:34:39
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-28 13:34:39
Also in:
lkml, virtualization
On 08/28/2012 03:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:quoted
Currently if VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC is enabled we will use indirect descriptors and allocate them using a simple kmalloc(). This patch adds a cache which will allow indirect buffers under a configurable size to be allocated from that cache instead. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <redacted>I imagine this helps performance? Any numbers?
I ran benchmarks on the original RFC, I've re-tested it now and got similar numbers to the original ones (virtio-net using vhost-net, thresh=16): Before: Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 16384 10.00 4512.12 After: Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 16384 16384 10.00 5399.18 Thanks, Sasha